jump to navigation

Britain’s Shame Is Mankind’s Shame June 10, 2009

Posted by bazmcstay in Human Nature, Latest News, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

The man in that video uttering those hateful words is Nick Griffin, leader of the British Nationalist Party. On Saturday night, he was elected as an MEP. I watched in absolute horror as he and another member of his racist band of violently right-wing bigots were given enough votes by the British public to go forward and represent that nation in the European Parliament. This vile creature has been given a legitimate political soapbox from which to speak for the next 5 years, his party’s profile and public funding will go through the roof and they will be in a position to spread their messages of evil to a wider audience.

These words I have used to describe Nick Griffin are the sort trotted out daily by The Sun and similar newspapers to describe every criminal that goes throught the justice system, but are as liberally applied to sports cheats. In the case of Nick Griffin, however, they are fully justified. It simply appals me to think that nearly 1million Britons voted for this man’s party and that people could listen to speeches like the one he made in the above video, like the ones he makes daily, and APPLAUD. There are those in Britain who AGREE with him, who voted for him, who think like him.

Now, the elections for Europe in Britain were, rather stupidly, mired in the MPs’ expenses scandal and proper European policy debate was lost in a welter of duck-houses and moats. The BNP ran a low-key campaign, reigning in some of their firebrands, keeping their message more akin to that of UKIP (another, slightly less hateful party) who spend most of their time complaining about those eternal scapegoats “European bureaucracy” and ” Faceless Brussels lawmakers”. They campaigned on petty local issues like potholes and bin collections. Devastatingly, people forgot that they were voting for a EUROPEAN candidate and, in the desire to vote against the major Westminster parties, far too many forgot the difference between a protest vote and voting for bigots and racists.

The rhetoric of Griffin’s speech above is chilling, with the resonating “THEY” used over and over again to describe black people, and a picture is painted of blacks as an under-race to be kept down. His condemnation of black brotherhood is awfully hypocritical given his essentialist view of Britain. He fires accusation after accusation at Barack Obama, couching them in “probably” to save himself from slander issues. He points to Obama’s “probable” anti-semitism and he has claimed not to be anti-semitic himself, despite his repeated denial of the Holocaust in the late 90s.

Nick Griffin has blamed “immigrants”, and especially the Muslim minorities, for causing Britain’s inner city drug problems. He sees gangland issues as black-centric, with black gangs attacking white people which lead to white gangs being formed to protect themselves. He sees no reason to institute anti-racist laws. He would close the borders of Britain to any migrants from Europe or farther afield and would “send home” all those who were not, in his eyes, “real Britons”. He preys on the poorer members of British society, blaming those of different colour skin or language for their plight, pulling them around the simplistic emblem of “BRITAIN”, something which they should protect from invaders.

It is scaremongering. It is the age-old tactic of the great dictators. Griffin has been dubbed “Fat Hitler” by some unflattering souls, but then again this is a man who is scarcely deserving of flattery. Some bemoan the fact that he has been given the oxygen of publicity – I’m not thrilled he has been given the oxygen of oxygen, truth be told, and those are words I would be loath to use of anyone. But those is a truly loathsome man. The horrifying thing is that there are those who support him. It made me cry to think of this as I watched this beaming lizard wave from his platform in Manchester.

In the same year as Barack Obama became President of the United States and it seemed that perhaps mankind had finally reached some sense of closure with its past differences, the BNP garnered 1million votes. 65 years after D-Day, when Europe seemed ready to unite under a banner of peace, 20 years after the Berlin Wall fell and borders were opened, now people seem more keen than ever to dismiss the European ideal and to turn inwards. Sure, it is a fairly natural reaction to be protective of ones heritage and no one in Ireland wants to hand away their Irishness, whatever that really is, but for people to fall time and again for worn-out words of bureaucracy, red-tape, faceless legislators, immigrants, THEY, it utterly depresses me.

We live in a time of supposed open-mindedness and open-heartedness. We should embrace difference, share our culture as we cling to it and sample other cultures as they sample ours. Our modern world is a melting-pot, full of what Gerard Manley Hopkins called “the grandeur of God” - whether you believe in God or not, the world certainly is grand. Or so I thought. It would appear that the hatred and elitism which humanity hoped to leave behind itself at the end of World War II still remains. Perhaps elitism, racism, the desire for national ideals (for that is where the term Nazi came from) are an ingrained human condition. I would hope, as I’m sure the majority of you do, that this is not the case. But while there are Nick Griffins and the BNP in this world, I’m not so sure.

Hatred breeds hatred. That is what Nick Griffin and his cohorts will continue to do unless people stand up and denounce them eloquently and effectively. Do not ignore the mistake you have made, Britain, but rectify it. Sadly, we have to wait 5 years to get these monsters out of office. By that time, who knows how many they will have recruited to their despicable cause. The fact that this cause still exists – and exists in other countries across Europe too – makes me weep for mankind’s inability to love one another. I mean that.

A Moment Of National Crisis March 27, 2009

Posted by bazmcstay in Ireland, Latest News, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=61052337940

The above is the link to one of at least 3 Facebook groups calling for the Gardaí and Irish Government to leave Conor Casby alone. Casby is the guerilla artist who, last week, placed unofficial nude caricatures of the Taoiseach, Brian Cowen on the walls of the National Gallery of Ireland and the RHA. The goverment forced RTE to apologise for their coverage of the story – and the opposition parties were then prevented from raising the issue in the Dáil - while the Gardaí were directed to find the artist responsible, leading them to demand his contact details from Today FM’s Ray Darcy Show – he had been in contact with the show and Gardaí questioned the station over its coverage of the issue. Casby presented himself voluntarily to Pearse Street Garda Station and, it seems, he is unlikely to be charged. His alleged crimes, apparently, the source of all this furore, are criminal damage, indecency and incitement to hatred.

Criminal Damage?! Hammering a nail into a wall?! Indecency?! In an art gallery chock full of nudes, in a modern world where Victoria’s Secret and Wonderbra can advertise freely?! Incitement to hatred?! In the name of all that is sacred, what the shitting bollocks tit is that supposed to mean?!?! Apologies for the profanity, but this story has really made me very angry (Oh really Barry? says you). One of the great gifts Irish people have is a great sense of humour and the country has a fine tradition of political satire. From Hall’s Pictorial Weekly to Scrap Saturday, Bull Island to Newstalk’s The Emergency, Irish people have laughed at our politicians for decades. I imagine Mr. Cowen would raise a belly-laugh rather than a witch-hunt were he in opposition and Enda Kenny was the focus of ridicule. What is more, Martyn Turner daily publishes caricatures poking fun at the political life of this country, yet there is no sign of a police investigation. If Conor Casby’s actions are incitement to hatred, then Martyn Turner has been getting away with it for years.

The world economy is in a slump, Irish people are losing their jobs at a level not seen for a long time, the outlook for the next twelve months is grim and the upcoming emergency budget is set to be a harsh one. The government are bound to be unpopular, sorry, but it’s a reality you face in times like these. What could have been a funny footnote in our Sunday papers has been allowed to snowball. When it would have been best – and, perhaps, most endearing - of Fianna Fáil and Brian Cowen to laugh along with the joke (you know, some witty joke about it being the only time he would be caught with his pants down), they flew off the handle. Michael Kennedy called upon Cathal Goan, Director General of RTE, to consider his position. Fianna Fáil ordered an apology. John O’Donohue, the Ceann Comhairle (speaker of the house), refused to let the issue be discussed when the opposition wanted to raise it. The Gardaí raided an independent radio station. Honestly, as someone pointed out on Facebook, if they had been this swift to knock on the doors of the banks, perhaps we would be in a better mood as a country. As it is, this is a funny story and the government has really had a sense of humour failure. If they can’t laugh at themselves, I can only imagine how frowny they get when they look at our national finances.

For God’s sake, lighten up. Even I find this particular piece of toilet humour funny.

PS: The Times Online tells me no nails were used. So, one less crime committed. They might commute his sentence from the death penalty to life in prison so.

A Long Time Coming January 21, 2009

Posted by bazmcstay in Arts, College, Football, Ireland, Latest News, Personal Favourites, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
-This Blog Post.
-The Inauguration of an African-American as President of the United States.
-The mid-season slump for Liverpool in the race for the Premiership.

Three events of varying importance, all a long time coming. I’ve been temporarily cut off from the rest of civilisation due to the untimely demise of my Dell’s battery, hence the delay in the latest post. I’m sure you were all desperately waiting for it. In between the death of the battery and now, I’ve been rehearsing for “Little Shop Of Horrors”, which I’m co-directing and which will be taking to the stage in the Players Theatre, Trinity College Dublin, from 17th to 21st February. Do come. And if you can’t, send money. Or flowers. Or both.

 
Wouter Mulders, John Gallagher, Barry McStay, Ciaran Clarke, Sarah Duffy, Matt Smyth, Becca Savoy, Marc Atkinson, Eoghan Quinn, Bri Fitzpatrick and Emer Kelly.

 

Improv, She Wrote performed at the New Players Theatre, Monday 19th January 2009. The troupe comprises (clockwise from top left): Wouter Mulders, John Gallagher, Barry McStay, Ciaran Clarke, Sarah Duffy, Matt Smyth, Becca Savoy, Marc Atkinson, Eoghan Quinn, Bri Fitzpatrick and Emer Kelly.

On top of that, I’ve also been onstage myself as part of Trinity College’s brand new improv comedy troupe, half-wittily named “Improv, She Wrote”. Comprising eleven members, we had our first live show ever in front of a packed house in the Players Theatre last night and, if the audience reaction was anything to go by, things went rather ok. Improv comedy is a really great form of entertainment, cheap to produce, fun, and great to watch when done well. It is a massive part of college life in America and, to a lesser extent, Britain, but has very few devotees in Ireland. But anyone has watched “Whose Line Is It Anyway?” or seen the Comedy Store Players in action will know how great good improv can be. We can only strive to be better. Thanks to those who came last night and do come again – after all, every show is different!

Liverpool, I’m afraid to say, have hit an icy patch this winter – as per usual. 6 draws in 9 games, if my count is correct. This habit we had of drawing games we should have won was one I thought we had kicked this year but sadly the addiction to mediocrity seems to be resurfacing. The goals need to start flowing at Anfield – the 5-1 rout of Newcastle seems to have been a flash in a very cold pan.

Finally, the tears were brimming again today. The sense of occasion was very obvious, even in a simple sitting room in campus rooms in Trinity College. I watched the inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama as America’s 44th President with a group of my friends. We clapped loudly when he was sworn in, felt for him as he stumbled nervously, and the silence was deafening as we hung on every word of his inaugural address.
I was aware of how unique a situation this really was. There are few moments in our lives when we experience a true moment of hope, an uplifting feeling of the world being, for a moment, good again, and say to ourselves “In the future, I will remember this moment. I will point to this instant and say, I was there, I saw this”. Some are personal, others very public affairs. One of these moments came when I watched the new pope, Benedict XVI, presented to the world – this was my faith remaking itself, renewing a sacred covenant.
Another of those moments occurred today. There was utter hope and faith in that room today as we watched the coverage from Washington. Today the world is good and right. Today America is better then it has been, thanks to one man and the millions who believed in his message, a message so simple and positive: Yes We Can. So, along with the country he now leads, let’s heed Obama’s call: Lift ourselves up, brush ourselves down, and begin to remake the world.

Yes We Can Have A Dream November 5, 2008

Posted by bazmcstay in Personal Favourites, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Dr. Martin Luther King – I Have A Dream.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy – Ask Not.

Nelson Mandela – Who Am I To Be Brilliant?

Abraham Lincoln – Government Of, By, For The People.

Robert Emmett – Let No Man Write My Epitaph.

Ronald Reagan – Tear Down This Wall.

Barack Obama, The 44th President Of The United States Of America – Yes We Can.

YES WE CAN.

Question Time From Washington October 31, 2008

Posted by bazmcstay in Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,
5 comments

I’m watching BBC’s “Question Time” – broadcast from Washington DC – which is dealing with the American election. There is a lady named Cheri Jacobus representing the Republicans sitting to the left of David Dimbleby. And she has just said that Barack Obama’s tax plan, which enacts cuts for 95% of the American people and reverses George Bush’s tax breaks for high earners above €250,000, is a giveaway and that it takes money away from those who have earned it and redistributes it to those who haven’t. So, according to this lady, the poor in American society – those who can’t afford the prohibitive health insurance, those who can’t pay off their mortgages, those who cannot send their children to university – do not deserve a tax break. In a time of global economic turmoil, at a time when the alleged class-less society of America has never been more polarized by economic conditions, John McCain would continue to line the pockets of the richest in America and would allow his country to labour under the lie of the American dream.

It is absurd to use the word “socialism” as a term of abuse when clearly a level of government support is necessary in America – as it is in practically every country in the world. In fact, such “socialist” support already exists in Medicare (free healthcare for over-60s), in government support for army veterans and in the tax credit system (albeit, credits which support those who need it least more than anyone else). To an outsider, the American dream would surely be best served by giving a helping hand, a leg-up to those who are struggling to get a foot onto the ladder. If America is the “land of the free”, why are some Americans not free to have their basic medical needs dealt with?

Oh, and one more thing from tonight’s programme. One questioner asked whether this was a unique American experience, the possible election of a fatherless man of African descent. Miss Jacobus pointed to the uniquely historical prospect of a female vice-president. Others waxed lyrical about the “land of opportunity” and how anyone can rise up to become the American president. No one pointed out that America is miles behind many of the world’s democracies in the election of a woman as head of state. No one asked why it had taken so long for an African American to reach this position – or asked why the prospect of Obama’s election was such a startlingly terrifying prospect for so many conservatives. And no one asked whether the “land of opportunity” would elect a Muslim. Or an “Ay-Rab”, so feared by that lady at a McCain rally a couple of weeks ago. 

No one needed to, to be honest, because the plain fact of the matter is no. Muslim, Arab, Socialist – the ultimate insults, it seems, to be hurled at a candidate. One of the people in the audience boasted about how America had given Iraq a “practically secular society”. Yet there is a growing sense that religion is playing a massive role in American politics. The possibility of a Muslim American president is as remote as an openly gay American president – there is a religious core to middle America which rears its fire-and-brimstone-spitting head at the prospect of its leader being from certain minorities.

I don’t wish to belittle the importance of religion in our lives – I’m a Catholic and my religion is a major part of my life – but intolerance is, in a word, intolerable. I’ve already said, America needs to see a black President. It could probably do with a female president, a gay president and a Muslim president. That sounds glib, but the fact is that there is a section of America which still needs certain myths to be shattered . Furthermore, America needs a boost – and that boost must start from the bottom up, not the top down. Cheri Jacobus would disagree – keep the poor poor, they don’t deserve anything better. Well Cheri, you shouted over everyone on the programme tonight but I’m hoping your voice will be drowned out on election night by the voice of reason. I can’t wait till November 4th - I want my Obama now!

A Post-It Note Left On The Fridge Of The United States Of America October 28, 2008

Posted by bazmcstay in Politics.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Hey USA

Did you forget to do the washing-up last night? We’re just asking, because it was you who did make the mess and we’d really like it if you could clean it up, not being a bitch or anything, just saying. Quick thing: We’d really love it if you elected that nice Mister Obama on November 4th. You may not realise this, but most of us are pretty keen on him. Even the non-European Socialists among us. And it’s not just because he speaks so well, but we actually think he’s the best thing that could ever happen to you. And us. Just thought we’d let you know.

Signed: Rest of the world.

PS: Get milk. And don’t forget to feed the Palin.

What Tommy Tiernan has to offer Post-Colonial Studies October 20, 2008

Posted by bazmcstay in Arts, Ireland, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

One of my English Literature courses this year is entitled “Post-Colonialism and Irish Studies”. For anyone who has ever studied English Literature, and particularly Literary Criticism, you will know what Post-Colonialism means. Or rather, you will know that you’re not supposed to know what Post-Colonialism means. The argument rages - admittedly, with all the violence of a damp tissue – in the critical sphere about the word Post-Colonialism: what it means, whether it can mean anything, whether it means several things or nothing, whether it’s a valid term in the first place, when exactly the ”Post” describes, even whether it should be hyphenated or not. So, riveting stuff, I’m sure you’ll agree.

For the non-English nerds, let me enlighten you. I’m could receive a flood of angry comments for the following, but I’m going to give you what I understand as “Post-Colonialism” in as straightforward a way as possible – and this isn’t a straightforward subject. Basically, Post-Colonial studies deals with the literature of nations which have experienced colonial rule - especially, it seems, members of the former British Empire – and explores the factors at play within that literature. Or something.

At a basic level, it looks at how culture - literature, in this case - of occupied countries evolves under colonial rule. Frantz Fanon describes three stages of literature under colonial rule: the first, when the literature is a mirror-image of the colonial culture’s literature and caters solely for that audience; second, after an awakening, begins to question the imperial rule, often looking to the past and seeking to establish a new sense of nation and a history and culture which may or may not have existed (in an Irish context, the literary revival, Yeats, Synge et al.) – that still may not cater to the entire “nation” but only to the intellectual and upper classes; thirdly, once that literature opens out and a wider national consciousness is established, there is outright literary war waged upon the occupying country.

There are loads and loads of terms and nuances and arguments which attend the discourse of post-colonialism. At the heart of post-colonial literature, however, there lies a constant search to establish the nation, to define what it is to be Indian or Nigerian or Irish. Some authors reject the former colonial literary influences entirely, others adopt and adapt them to their own hybridic ends.

And that leads me to my curious title. Ireland was occupied and ruled, in various guises and forms, by England for nearly 800 years. Tommy Tiernan’s joke in his first DVD runs as follows: “What does it mean to be Irish? It means your not fuckin’ English.” And that, it seems, was basically it. For 800 years. Ireland defined itself largely on the basis that we were a small nation being “supressed” by a bigger one. Heroes rose and fell, a history and folk tradition was created around Irishness as a romantic and sorrowful ideal. Ireland’s culture of suffering was a defining feature of our literature and, indeed, our politics. We were Irish – and everything that went with that term: repressed, downtrodden but merry, artful, sorrowful, sufferers – because the English were in our country and we were not English.

That’s Irish history in as crude, nationalistic and blatant a form as possible. But now? Can the same be said? What does it mean to be Irish now? Now that Ireland (or most of it, anyway) is independent, now the English are gone, now we are prosperous thanks to the legendary Celtic Tiger, who are we? We can’t continue to be Irish by our non-Englishness. The mythic Ireland, de Valera’s Ireland, Synge’s Ireland, Ireland of the sorrows is an underlying thread in Irish culture even now, an endemic part of us, but it is no longer our be-all and end-all.

Paul Durcan, the poet, in one of his recent collections, scrabbles around on golf courses looking for Ireland – are the golf courses the new English, do we define ourselves by them? I think it is unsurprising that the renowned Irish poets of today, those who are most widely read and who are, perhaps, most successful, are the Ulster Poets: Heaney, Mahon, Longley, Carson and others. Their most important work, their best work, the stuff we are all beaten over the head with at Leaving Cert level, was written at the height of the Troubles. The Ulster Poets were writing in a Northern Ireland gripped by violence, where the culture was one of opposition: You were Irish or English, Catholic or Protestant, Green or Orange. The nation - or non-nation is perhaps more accurate – was defined by its very indefinition, by its war, by its relationship with England and with its own history. The Northern Poets had a meaning, a focal point. Durcan has golf courses.

Down south, we are blessed in our stability but we are also wracked by something of an identity crisis. We are richer materially but poorer spiritually. We are independent Ireland but Ireland is now a multicultural melting-pot. We have a past which was a march focused on what is now our present, but we don’t know where our present is now leading. We are building a nation but destroying the countryside which made the Emerald Isle so emerald. We thought the English government was corrupt but now can’t trust our own politicians. We are great singers, artists, writers and sportsmen but we can’t bear to look at ourselves without seeing something to be cynical about.

I’m “very Irish”, as one of my English friends has pointed out. I love so much about Ireland and I would find it very difficult to leave – if only for the fact that I’d miss the rain, Barry’s Tea, All-Ireland Final day and me mammy, like any other Irish male. And yet I wonder about what it really is to be Irish. I believe that an intense awareness of our past, our suffering, our heroes and, yes, our language and legends is what makes up much of the Irish person – maybe even a bit of “not being English” when there’s a sport’s match against the old enemy! But that isn’t enough anymore. It isn’t enough to be a colonised people anymore, because that colonial enemy isn’t there – dammit man, some of my best friends are English! And I can’t bludgeon them with a shillelagh and luascadh around their dead bodies, throwing shamrocks into the air and singing “A Nation Once Again”, like in the good ol’ days. Nor do I want to – because we’re all grown up after all. As I say somewhere else in this blog, the English have played rugby in Croke Park, our colonial past has been left behind.

And where does that leave us? Turning off The Corrs CD in the Merc as we pull up at the K-Club for a quick round with Fintan and Ruairí, before a quick bite at Guilbaud’s and a few cocktails in Krystle with the Leinster rugby team? Call me flippant, but you have to wonder: Is this it? And it’s not it, of course – it’s the life of a lucky few but it seems like it’s the new dream to which the country must aspire, like independence once was. Certainly, the question remains relevant. What exactly does being Irish mean anymore? What do we want to do with ourselves? Answers please on a postcard.

Yes We Can, Yes He Will October 20, 2008

Posted by bazmcstay in Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

How uncool does this sound? I left a cabaret/rave party (Cabarave, if you will) at 2am on Wednesday night to go home and watch the final US Presidential debate. Call me a geek, but no one can deny that the 2008 race for the White House has been one of the most fascinating and historic political contests in history. The focus has been on the age, colour, sex and experience of the players for much of the campaign. It has taken a virtual meltdown in the global economy for the novelty of a black candidate and a possible female vice-president to wear off and for the focus to shift onto the actual policies of Obama and McCain.

The debate the other night was the best of the three. The setting – a small table with both candidates sitting facing each other in close proximity - led to a sense of confrontation and certainly John McCain came out with much more energy and fight than he had displayed in the previous two installments. Perhaps someone had laced his porridge with cocaine. Whatever the reason, he went at Obama with the pitbull bite which Sarah Palin would have admired.

And yet, Obama is roundly considered to have won the debate. Already 14 points ahead in the polls, Obama is edging ahead in every demographic category – including white males and women – and is laying siege to vital Republican states such as Virginia (which no Democrat has won since 1964) and Ohio (which no Republican president has failed to win). One Republican senator, appearing on the BBC in the wake of the debate, even conceded the popular vote to Obama and called on McCain’s campaign to focus on winning the necessary electoral college votes!

I’m not going to rant and rave about the insanity of the Electoral College System – the absolute mockery it makes of the so-called “greatest democracy in the world” is obvious. In case you are unaware, the Presidential election in America is not decided on a “first-past-the-post” system (i.e.: the candidate with the most votes wins). Instead, each state is allocated a number of Electoral College Votes based on its number of senators and representatives at Congress which go to the candidate who wins that state’s popular vote. Thus arose the absurd situation in 1876, 1888 and, famously, 2000 when a man who more than half of the population rejected became the president of the country. 2000 saw more people vote for Al Gore than for George W. Bush, yet Bush won the college vote and the presidency.

Anyway, let’s put the ridiculousness of the electoral system aside and ask why Obama won the debate and why he is so far out in front. Economic crisis is generally considered to bring gains for the Democrats with their focus on the middle class, a trait derided by McCain and his Republican colleagues as “European socialism”. Well, sorry to burst your bubble John, but that “European socialism” at leasts delivers accessible universal health services which care for the entire country, not just those who can afford it. For McCain to rubbish Obama’s healthcare plan is sheer stubborn conservatism.

Furthermore, Obama keeps pointing to the money being expended abroad in Iraq (€10billion a month) and has it earmarked for better use in his own country. McCain et al. deride Obama’s desire to pull out of Iraq as soon as feasible as weakness, even as a lack of patriotism. That argument isn’t holding much water now though as America needs all the dollars it can muster and to keep them at home.

In fact, the McCain camp is running a highly unsuccessful negative campaign against Obama. Tenuous links to former terrorists, spending government money in his home state (as opposed to not spending any money…?), refusing to use public funding and pouring cash into his campaign, lack of experience (unlike former beauty queen and mayor of Wasilla, Governor Sarah Palin), liberalism – any perceived flaw, the Republicans are jumping on it.

And all the while, Barack Obama sails serenely on. His demeanour throughout the debate on Wednesday was measured and statesmanlike, whereas McCain seemed overly aggressive. He seemed ratty, irritated, angry. And in troubled times, it seems like a calm head is what America wants. Attacks on Obama’s tax plan, healthcare plan, defence plan, energy and environmental plan, even the wrath of “Joe The Plumber” were all brushed off by the Democrat and he has managed to become less didactic and more understandable in his discourses. He even displayed a brilliant sense of humour at the Al Smith memorial dinner the following night when he and McCain traded so-called “roasts”. Look it up on Youtube. It’s brilliant. “Contrary to the rumours you have heard, I was not born in a manger. I was actually born on Krypton…Greatest weekness, its possible that I am a little too awesome”. Brilliant.

The earlier ridicule heaped on Obama by Fox News and Friends for being too eloquent(!) has been picked up by McCain. But with the Republicans now fighting a seemingly 100% negative battle, focusing on the opponent’s flaws than their own policies, saying that Obama is ”all words and no substance” is utterly redundant. In fact, the Democrat has been steady in his campaign the whole way through, drumming home his policies, reacting to every barb, criticism and crisis with commendable grace.

And yes, it will be historic when the first black President of the United States is elected. And no, it will not signal the end of democracy in that country, as some conservatives fear. One lady at a McCain rally had to be reassured that Obama was not an “Arab” but, in fact, a good man. McCain is a distinguished public servant and a war hero, but to imply that Obama could not be both an “Arab” a good man (which is the implication of his apparent defence of his opponent) is inexcusable.

Every now and again there are moments in a nation’s history when a dark piece of the past is put aside, when the book is closed on a chapter its people would rather not read, a moment which the nation will look at and say “Then. Then we stood up straighter. Then we looked ourselves in the mirror and saw what needed to be done. Then we became better than we had ever been.” For Ireland, one of those moments came in 2007 when England arrived to play rugby at Croke Park. It may sound strange to anyone not acquainted with the history, but to be there, to hear “God Save The Queen” played in THAT stadium, to belt out our own anthem louder than ever and then to beat the living shite out of the English in the best possible way – on the playing field rather than the battlefield -, it was possibly the most emotional moment a soppy, old, Irish nationalist could experience. People like that lady at McCain’s rally actually NEED to see a black president. The McCarthy era might eventually be forgotten and the ghost of segregation finally laid to rest. America might just grow up a little in that moment.

I’m not hiding my colours here. I want Obama to win. And you know what? I’m pretty damn sure I’m in the majority and I’m pretty damn sure it will be the right decision. I’ve become so excited about the prospect of the election, passionate even. And I could write two, three times as much about the reasons why Obama should win and why McCain should not. But suffice to say that I think that Obama becoming the US President will be the greatest thing to happen to America and, possibly, the world in my 23 years on the planet. It sounds like hyperbole. But the more I listen to Obama, the more I see the sort of people who oppose his election, the more I look at the world, the more convinced I become.

So, come November 4th, I will be glued to the TV screen. I watched when Joseph Ratzinger emerged as the new Pope and was intensely moved by the religious and spiritual significance of the moment. I hope that I will watch Barack Obama become the most powerful man in the world in two weeks and I know I will be intensely moved by the political and historical significance. And that term, “most powerful man in the world”, sounds much less scary when you look into Obama’s eyes and hear him speak. The world will be in pretty safe hands with this man in the White House.